PARIS, BRUSSELS, 10 August 2015 (FIDH & VCHR) – FIDH and its member organization Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR) said today that if finalised without conducting a human-rights impact assessment (HRIA) and without introducing the necessary human rights safeguards, the EU-Vietnam Free trade and investment agreement (FTA) would be concluded in flagrant violation of EU law. FIDH and VCHR reiterate their call for the EU Commission (EC) to conduct a human rights impact assessment before finalizing the deal and to introduce the needed clauses and safeguards. FIDH and VCHR call also the other EU institutions to stand firm and require the EU to comply fully with its obligations.<\/p>\n
The two organizations made the call after the EC announced, on 4 August 2015 that the EU and Vietnam had reached an agreement \u201cin principle\u201d for an FTA, while some textual technicalities remain to be finalised.<\/p>\n
\u201cBrussels refusal to include a human rights impact assessment of the FTA is the latest example of EU policies that prioritize business over the respect for human rights, instead of trying to reconcile them\u201d<\/strong><\/em> said FIDH President Karim Lahidji.<\/p>\n \u201cThe EUs actions are inexcusable and send Vietnam the wrong message. How can Brussels expect Vietnam to comply with its human rights obligations if the EU ignores its own laws?\u201d<\/strong><\/em> said VCHR President Vo Van Ai. \u201cWithout strong human rights safeguards, the EU-Vietnam free trade agreement is likely to cause an increase in human rights abuses in Vietnam\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Introducing human rights safeguards would address significant shortcomings in trade agreements, weighing in the human rights of European citizens and those of the Vietnamese people over business interests. Such safeguards could include indicators measuring the impact of the agreement, introduce redress and accountability mechanisms for affected communities, and organise a human and people centred development over business interests, notably in remediating the deficient and unbalanced investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms.<\/p>\n The ECs move is all the more troubling that it blatantly contradicts EU law and ignores several calls of EU institutions and UN experts.<\/p>\n On 17 April 2014, the European Parliament<\/font><\/a> adopted a resolution urging the EC to carry out a human rights impact assessment of the envisaged FTA with Vietnam. On 19 May 2014, the Council<\/font><\/a> of the European Union also stressed the \u201cimportance of continuing to carry out human rights impact assessments for trade and investment agreements.\u201d On 26 March 2015, in its draft recommendation, the EU Ombudsperson, in response to a complaint jointly submitted by FIDH and VCHR on 7 August 2014<\/font><\/a>, found that the ECs failure to carry out a specific human rights impact assessment, as part of the negotiations for an FTA with Vietnam, constituted maladministration<\/font><\/a>. The EU Ombudsperson recommended that the EC carry out such an assessment \u201cwithout further delay.\u201d<\/p>\n On 2 June 2015, UN experts<\/font><\/a>, voicing concern over adverse impact of free trade and investment agreements on human rights, called also for ex-ante<\/em> and ex-post<\/em> human rights impact assessments and insisted on the necessity to improve the human rights safeguards in the FTA and investment agreements \u00a0<\/a>(1)<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cBy ignoring such calls and by precipitating an agreement before the end of the EU ombudsperson procedure, the European Commission suggests it is above the Law, with no institution, public debate or mechanism to prevent this from happening. This questions the Rule of Law in the EU.\u201d<\/strong><\/em> said FIDH President Karim Lahidji.<\/p>\n In an open letter<\/font><\/a> published today, FIDH and VCHR call upon the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to revisit the conclusion of the negotiations by the EC, so as to ensure the inclusion of their previous demands to make a human right impact assessment, and to put in place the necessary human rights safeguards into the agreement.<\/p>\n \nPress contacts<\/strong> (1) See for example European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010<\/font><\/a> on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements & European Parliament resolution of 29 April 2015<\/font><\/a> on the second anniversary of the Rana Plaza building collapse and progress of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact; EPRS briefing, Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) State of play and prospects for reform<\/font><\/a>, 21 January 2014; A Model Human Rights Clause for the EUs International Trade Agreements<\/font><\/a>, Lorand Bartels, February 2014; see also OECD, \u201cInvestment treaty law, sustainable development and responsible business conduct: a fact finding survey\u201d<\/font><\/a>, June 2014 & \u201cUN experts voice concern over adverse impact of free trade and investment agreements on human rights\u201d<\/font><\/a>, 2 june 2015 press release; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, principle 9.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" PARIS, BRUSSELS, 10 August 2015 (FIDH & VCHR) – FIDH and its member organization Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR) said today that if finalised without conducting a human-rights impact assessment (HRIA) and without introducing the necessary human rights safeguards, the EU-Vietnam Free trade and investment agreement (FTA) would be concluded in flagrant violation of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":375,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2511","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","","category-vchr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2511","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/375"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2511"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2511\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2511"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2511"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2511"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nFIDH:<\/strong> Ms Ga\u00eblle Dusepulchre (English & French on EU issues and FTA) \u2013 Tel: +32479491959 (Brussels) ; Mr. Andrea Giorgetta (English on Vietnam) – Tel: +66 886117722 (Bangkok); Mr. Arthur Manet (French, English, Spanish) – Tel: +33 672284294 (Paris)
\nVCHR:<\/strong> Ms. Penelope Faulkner (English, French, Vietnamese) – Tel. + 33 145983085 (Paris)<\/p>\n
\n