{"id":35514,"date":"2017-05-02T09:56:29","date_gmt":"2017-05-02T09:56:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/queme.org\/en\/?p=35514"},"modified":"2017-05-02T12:10:55","modified_gmt":"2017-05-02T12:10:55","slug":"eprid-shares-best-practices-ep-conference-religious-belief-communities-reach-words-deeds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/eprid-shares-best-practices-ep-conference-religious-belief-communities-reach-words-deeds\/","title":{"rendered":"EPRID shares best practices at EP Conference on \u201cHow religious and belief communities reach out to each other in words and deeds\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

PARIS 2 May 2017 (VCHR) \u2013 The Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR) joined members of EPRID (European Platform on Religious Intolerance and Discrimination) at a conference at the European Parliament on the positive role religious and faith communities can play in promoting solidarity and peace. EPRID is a network of civil society organizations, including religious and non-religious associations, operating a European level to advance the right to freedom of religion or belief in the world as defined by Article 18 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. VCHR has been a member of EPRID since the platform\u2019s creation in 2006. Please read EPRID\u2019s Press Statement below:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Press Release<\/strong>: Brussels, 30 April 2017<\/p>\n

At a meeting organized by the European Parliament\u2019s Intergroup on Religious Freedom or Belief and Religious Tolerance on 25th<\/sup> April 2017, EPRID joined a panel of academics, religious leaders and field experts on the theme of \u201cBest practices: How religious and belief communities reach out to each other in words and deeds\u201d. <\/strong>The meeting was hosted by the EP Intergroup\u2019s Co-chair Dennis De Jong, with a keynote speech by Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief.<\/p>\n

Elizabeta Kitanovic<\/strong> outlined EPRID\u2019s objectives<\/a> and activities since its foundation in 2006, such as its contribution to the drafting process of the EU Guidelines on FoRB and EEAS training on FoRB for EU diplomats. \u201c<\/em>EPRID is an example of how relationships among members grow and advance each time we find common denominators related to EU policy\u201d, <\/em>she said. \u201cThe platform helps us to be more aware of sensitivities to different cultural and religious sources of diversity, to communicate openly and to enter to meaningful dialogue\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Elizabeta
Elizabeta Kitanovic & Rachel Bayani<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Rachel Bayani<\/strong> expressed EPRID\u2019s conviction that meaningful religious collaboration requires a new approach and even change of mindset. \u201cI<\/em>t is no longer enough that religious communities are encouraged to tolerate each other or to live peacefully side by side. The requirements of this age are such that our efforts need to go into nurturing deep bonds of friendship, cordial collaboration and mutual support between religious communities\u201d.<\/em> She urged all participants to \u201cthink profoundly about what narratives are helpful and which ones are not helpful in fostering religious collaboration. How is the constant insistence on exclusivity or finality, or on privileged access to truth a barrier to whole hearted collaboration? How, on the other hand, is an acknowledgement of a variety of ways to relate to the transcendental key in promoting mutual support?\u201d <\/em>This key, she said, is to \u201cshift the focus from repeatedly highlighting the difference in doctrine, rituals and legal codes to really gaining a deeper understanding of that which unites us\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Dr.
Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, UN Special Rapporteur on FoRB<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dr. Ahmed Shaheed,<\/strong> UN Special Rapporteur on FoRB, focused on the positive role of religion and religious freedom in promoting peace. Whereas religion is often associated with violence and conflict, he said, \u201c<\/em>to ignore the positive role that religious and belief communities can play is to lose some of the best resources that the world has to address some of the pressing challenges of our time\u201d. <\/em>Religious and belief communities are often at the heart of struggles for freedom, human rights and democracy, indeed \u201cone reason why authoritarian regimes seek to silence and suppress religious and belief leaders and communities is because they represent the aspirations of a better world\u201d. <\/em>Dr. Shaheed noted a general failure to understand that religious freedom, human rights and security are not mutually exclusive, but in fact are interdependent. \u201cHow can we demonstrate this interdependence? We can do that when when we are able to show that it is freedom of religion that<\/em> can create societies that can be resilient against the very concerns held by the security community\u2014that it is freedom of religion that will give the space for hate speech to be discredited; to challenge the hatemongers, to mobilise the positive resources of religion and belief, and to ensure the forces of darkness cannot prevail\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Practical examples of best practices between religious and faith communities in many parts of the world were given by Milad F Dagher- <\/strong>Evangelical Christian Alliance Church on reponses the Syrian and Iraqi refugee crisis, Feije Duim <\/strong>and Adriana de Fijter, <\/strong>Kerk in Actie, Netherlands, Michael El Daba,<\/strong> Coptic Evangelical Organization for Social Services, Egypt: Nahla Aldelmoety Hussein and Yolande Iliano, <\/strong>SB Overseas and Religions for Peace; Senaid Kobilica <\/strong>(Representative of the Islamic community of Bosnia-Herzegovina to the EU) and Sabina Arnaut Jahic <\/strong>– International Forum of Solidarity – Emmaus, Bosnia-Herzegovina.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

———————————————-<\/em><\/p>\n

EPRID is a network of civil society organisations, including religious and non-religious associations, that aims to contribute to the collective promotion and protection of the right to freedom of religion or belief in the world as defined by Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.<\/em><\/p>\n

Member Organizations<\/em><\/a>: Association internationale pour la d\u00e9fense de la libert\u00e9 religieuse \/ Baha\u2019i International\u00a0Community \/ CEJI \u2013 A Jewish Contribution to an Inclusive Europe \/ Christian Solidarity Worldwide \/ Conference of\u00a0European Churches \/ European Evangelical Alliance \/ European Union Office of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day\u00a0Saints \/ Global Human Rights Defence \/ Human Rights Without Frontiers \/ Open Doors International \/ Qu\u00ea Me: Vietnam Committee for Human Rights\u00a0 \u2013 International Buddhist Information Bureau<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PARIS 2 May 2017 (VCHR) \u2013 The Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (VCHR) joined members of EPRID (European Platform on Religious Intolerance and Discrimination) at a conference at the European Parliament on the positive role religious and faith communities can play in promoting solidarity and peace. EPRID is a network of civil society organizations, including …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":434,"featured_media":35515,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[137,113,98,64],"tags":[362,361],"class_list":["post-35514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-latest-posts","category-news","category-press-release","category-vchr","tag-eprid","tag-un-special-rapporteur-on-forb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/434"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35514\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35515"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}