{"id":36254,"date":"2017-02-08T10:00:39","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T10:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/queme.org\/en\/?p=36254"},"modified":"2017-07-18T08:50:33","modified_gmt":"2017-07-18T08:50:33","slug":"uscirf-religious-freedom-vietnam-assessing-cpc-designation-10-years-removal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/uscirf-religious-freedom-vietnam-assessing-cpc-designation-10-years-removal\/","title":{"rendered":"USCIRF:<\/em> Religious Freedom in Vietnam: Assessing the CPC Designation 10 Years After its Removal"},"content":{"rendered":"

VIETNAM: USCIRF Assesses State Department\u2019s CPC Removal<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"Religious<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

WASHINGTON, D.C., February 8, 2017 (USCIRF) \u2013 The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) today released Religious Freedom in Vietnam: Assessing the Country of Particular Concern Designation 10 Years After its Removal<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Because of its \u201csystematic, ongoing, and egregious\u201d violations of religious freedom, Vietnam had been designated a \u201ccountry of particular concern\u201d (or CPC) by the State Department from 2004 until 2006, when, as a result of U.S. diplomatic negotiations, Vietnam promised to improve religious freedom.<\/p>\n

This new report examines the history and efficacy of Vietnam\u2019s CPC designation and the implication on religious freedom in Vietnam 10 years after the State Department removed Vietnam as a \u201ccountry of particular concern.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cTen years after the State Department\u2019s removal of Vietnam as a CPC, religious freedom conditions in the country are at a pivotal moment.\u00a0 While these conditions have improved in some instances, severe religious violations continue that are inconsistent with international standards<\/em><\/strong>,\u201d said USCIRF Chair Thomas J. Reese, S.J. \u201cAlthough the Vietnamese government sought to address these concerns in the recently passed law on religion and belief, this measure is imperfect and disadvantages many religious communities<\/em><\/strong>. If Vietnam does not implement religious freedom reforms that are consistent with international standards, USCIRF will continue to call for its designation as a country of particular concern<\/em><\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Religious freedom conditions in many parts of Vietnam continue to deteriorate in some areas, notwithstanding that many individuals and communities freely practice their faith. In some areas, local authorities harass and discriminate against religious organizations that the government does not recognize. In addition, religious groups across Vietnam fear that the government will evict them from or demolish their properties. USCIRF has recommended CPC designation for Vietnam every year since 2002.<\/p>\n

To view the report in Vietnamese, please click here<\/a>. For more information on religious freedom conditions in Vietnam, please see USCIRF\u2019s Vietnam chapter in the 2016 Annual Report (in\u00a0English<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Vietnamese<\/a>), and USCIRF\u2019s recent press release VIETNAM: At a Crossroads, 10 Years after CPC Designation Removed<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

VIETNAM: USCIRF Assesses State Department\u2019s CPC Removal     WASHINGTON, D.C., February 8, 2017 (USCIRF) \u2013 The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) today released Religious Freedom in Vietnam: Assessing the Country of Particular Concern Designation 10 Years After its Removal. Because of its \u201csystematic, ongoing, and egregious\u201d violations of religious freedom, Vietnam had …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":434,"featured_media":36259,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[122,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","","category-countries-international-organisations","category-resources"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/434"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36254"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36254\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36259"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queme.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}